DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano MUST BE FIRED!
And just so it’s perfectly clear, we aren’t talking about her resigning (either gracefully or in disgrace). And it’s way too late for backhanded apologies, like the ‘slap-in-the-face’ she already gave the brave men and women who have wore a uniform and proudly served this country.
Janet Napolitano must be FIRED… and it should have been done yesterday!
You see, the problem is not just that Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) put together a so-called anti-terrorism security assessment that targets mainstream Americans as dangerous extremists.
We’re talking about millions of people who believe that our government is too large and taxes us too much, like those who participated in the TEA Parties on tax day. We are talking about everyday Americans who believe that the 2nd Amendment actually gives people the right to bear arms; people who are pro-life; the millions of people who believe that our nation’s immigration laws should be strictly enforced.
And the problem is not simply that this so-called security assessment targets patriotic Americans – and they are talking about YOU – as “right wing extremists,” or, as Peter Kirsanow with the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights put it:
“That DHS report warning about all manner of ‘right-wing extremists’ could be considerably shortened if it simply alerted law-enforcement officials to be on the lookout for people from ‘small towns (who are) bitter (and) cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment.’”
The problem is that this is the same Janet Napolitano who just recently told us that horrendous, unspeakable acts committed by actual terrorists, dead set on destroying our country and killing Americans, should be called “man-caused disasters.”
Specifically she told Der Spiegel:
“In my speech, although I did not use the word ‘terrorism,’ I referred to ‘man-caused’ disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.”
So… when it comes to actual acts or threats of terrorism against mainstream Americans, we should move beyond the “politics of fear.”
But patriotic Americans like YOU – who exercise your Constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights – pose a threat to the government.
Is it actually possible that Napolitano and Barack Obama and even some within the Obama Administration are so twisted as to believe that Islamic Terrorists are the good guys and that you are the bad guys?
Syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin in Thursday’s Washington Times wrote:
“What and who exactly are President Obama’s homeland security officials afraid of these days? If you are a member of an active conservative group that opposes abortion, favors strict immigration enforcement, lobbies to protect Second Amendment rights, protests big government, advocates federalism, or represents veterans who believe in any of the above, the answer is: You.”
If what is contained in this leaked DHS security assessment does not bring you to the realization that it is time for all patriotic Americans who love freedom to stand up and shout that we’re not going to take it anymore… it is quite possible that nothing will.
So, here’s what we’re going to do. We’re going to make it very clear that we want drastic action. We’re going to make it very clear that Janet Napolitano needs to go. We’re going to make it very clear that we want her FIRED – PERIOD… no resignations will be allowed… no meaningless apologies will be accepted.
We’re going to bang this issue like a gong.
Let’s get to work.
The DHS Report Targets All Of You Bitter People Out There Who Cling To Guns And Religion.
Malkin is not alone. Syndicated radio talk-show host Michael Reagan went so far as to ask the following:
“Have we really come to this? Has Adolf Hitler’s propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels been reborn and recruited by the Obama administration to scare the heck out of the American people with absurdities such as this whacked-out document?”
Lance Fairchok writing for AmericanThinker.com hits the nail squarely on the head.
Calling this so-called security assessment “a shot across the bow” he plainly states that DHS is NOT simply referring to individuals living on society’s fringe.
The assessment is, in fact, referring to YOU and patriotic Americans like you.
Moreover, Fairchok believes this assessment was hastily and sloppily written in order to fit a sick and disgusting preconceived notion:
“This ‘assessment’ is not an analysis of a national trend or an examination of existing evidence or even recent radical literature; it is targeting those whose politics fall within the broad insinuations contained within its pages, namely mainstream conservatives.”
Judge Andrew Napolitano with FOX News essentially says the same thing:
“The summary contains few proper names, has no footnotes of any significance, lists very few sources, and is drafted with a prejudice against anyone who criticizes the role of the federal government in our lives today. It lumps together in its definition of ‘rightwing extremism’ hate groups, anti-government groups, and single issue groups ‘such as opposition to abortion or immigration.’”
Let’s state it more plainly. As far as Janet Napolitano’s DHS is concerned, if you are pro-life or believe in strict enforcement of our immigration laws, or if you attended one of those TEA parties, you’re the same as a neo-Nazi, or a member of the KKK. You are dangerous and pose no less a threat than the real terrorists trying to destroy our great country. Is it possible that when Barack Obama spoke of bitter people from small towns who cling to God and their guns that he was not just simply being derisive?
Is it possible that pointing out that Barack Obama sat in a Church for years listening to a lunatic pontificate, “Not God Bless America… God D___ America” WAS relevant after all?
There’s only one way to find out.
You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet.
What purpose can be served by a document that classifies mainstream Americans as “extremists” who pose a clear and present danger to our nation’s security?
Fairchok again:
“It is a manipulative information tool intended to paint the loyal opposition as reactionary kooks who are prone to violence and a danger to the country. … This is part of a more widespread ongoing information campaign to plant and reinforce critical themes into the American official, and broader public psyche, a continuation of the ‘clinging to guns and religion’ message so frequently found in the rhetoric of President Obama and his acolytes.”
And Fairchok concludes by issuing a very somber warning.
“And we ain’t seen nothin’ yet.”
But what is even more disturbing is that DHS NEVER intended the public to see this so-called security assessment. It was a secret.
Reagan again:
“Obviously recognizing that public knowledge of the nonsense alleged in this document is very undesirable, the weirdoes who prepared it did not want you to see it. … They warn: ‘No portion of the LES (Law Enforcement Sensitive) information should be released to the media, the general public, or over non-secure Internet servers.’”
Judge Napolitano again:
“The document itself cautions the reader that the document is ‘not to be released to the public, the media, or other personnel who do not have a valid need-to-know without prior approval’ of the DHS. The document refers to itself as one of a series of intelligence assessments intended to ‘deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States.’”
But there’s even more.
Are you ready for this?
The portion of this so-called security assessment that was leaked is only a SUMMARY.
The bulk of it remains CLASSIFIED. We have no idea what’s in it.
Judge Napolitano continues:
“The summary (unclassified) document is terrifying. One can only imagine what is contained in the classified version. This document runs directly counter to numerous U.S. Supreme decisions prohibiting the government from engaging in any activities that could serve to chill the exercise of expressive liberties. Liberties are chilled, in constitutional parlance, when people are afraid to express themselves for fear of government omnipresence, monitoring, or reprisals. The document also informs the reader that Big Brother is watching both public and private behavior.”
But whatever else is in there… it cannot be pretty.
Judge Napolitano yet again:
“My guess is that the sentiments revealed in the report I read are the tip of an iceberg that the DHS would prefer to keep submerged until it needs to reveal it. This iceberg is the heavy-hand of government; a government with large and awful eyes, in whose heart there is no love for freedom, and on whose face there is no smile.”
There is no time to lose, we must act now.
Yours In Freedom,
Jeffrey Mazzella
Center for Individual Freedom
917-B King Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-535-5836
Fax:703-535-5838
CFIF is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit constitutional advocacy organization with
the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Contributions to CFIF are
not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
Contributions may be deductible as a business expense.
Powered by GrassTopsUSA
The Intelligence Report 