Archive for the 'U.S. Department Of Justice' Category

06
May
09

Obama and his homeland security think of most americans

This video is not suprizing at all…This is what Obama and his thugs think of most of americans!
I wonder if Obama knows what most americans think of him?..Let me touch on that for just a bit.

Lets see..Obama and his thugs in his cabinet and most of congress are:

1. Criminals
2. Socialists
3. Traitors
4. Unsurpers Of Our Constitution ( See Number 1
5. Terrorist sympathizers ( See Number 3
6. Thugs
7. Tax Cheats
8. Liars
9. Corrupt
10. Leftwing Extremists

Look at this video and see for yourself what he thinks of americans

04
May
09

Schumer Promises Sweeping Immigration Law…More Corruption

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer is predicting that sweeping immigration reform will become law before the year is over.

Schumer, a Democrat and chairman of the Senate’s immigration subcommittee, spoke at the New York Daily News/Citizenship Now! headquarters. He said he expected Senate hearings to lead to a major change in U.S. policy, the Daily News reported.

“I believe that this year, we can pass comprehensive, strong, fair immigration reform,” Schumer said.

Schumer’s comments came on the heels of President Barack Obama saying America can’t continue with a “broken” immigration system.

Obama has stated that he supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes an eventual path to citizenship for millions of foreigners illegally in the United States. During his presidential campaign, he promised to make the issue a “top priority” during his first year in office.

Last week, Obama said immigration reform is necessary because the current system is “not good for American workers. It’s dangerous for Mexican would-be workers who are trying to cross a dangerous border. It is putting a strain on border communities … And it keeps those undocumented workers in the shadows, which means they can be exploited at the same time as they’re depressing U.S. wages.”

Obama said his administration would first work to secure America’s borders before trying to reform U.S. immigration policy.

“If the American people don’t feel like you can secure the borders, then it’s hard to strike a deal that would get people out of the shadows and on a pathway to citizenship who are already here, because the attitude of the average American is going to be, well, you’re just going to have hundreds of thousands of more coming in each year,” he said.

“On the other hand, showing that there is a more thoughtful approach than just raids of a handful of workers as opposed to, for example, taking seriously the violation of companies that sometimes are actively recruiting these workers to come in. That’s again something we can start doing administratively.”

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

21
Apr
09

Civil Rights: ‘Use ’em Or Lose ’em’

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

WND columnist Janet Porter is warning Americans if they want to keep their civil rights, they’d better be using them right now.

Porter in her newest column took on the issue of the recent “extremist” report from the Department of Homeland Security.

The federal agency’s report is called “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.”

It already has generated a lawsuit by talk radio host Michael Savage and multiple calls for Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to be removed.

According to the federal government, characteristics of members of the suspect group of people include those who:

* Oppose restrictions on firearms

* Oppose lax immigration

* Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs

* Oppose continuation of free trade agreements

* Oppose same-sex marriage

* Has paraonia of foreign regimes

* Fear Communist regimes

* Oppose one world government

* Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world

* Is upset with the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India

Porter wrote, “The only way we can keep our freedoms is if we’ll use them – now.”

“One thing’s for sure – we aren’t going to stand by while they profile good, law-abiding citizens as terrorists and take away constitutional freedoms,” she wrote.

“Therefore, we, the law-abiding citizens of America, demand:

1. “The resignation or removal of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano for her partisan political profiling of veterans and conservatives and her abuse of power.

2. “An apology from President Barack Obama to ALL Americans for his administration’s call for domestic spying.

3. “The immediate retraction of the “Rightwing Extremism” report for labeling law-abiding citizens as “terrorists” because of their political views.”

“If you’d like to help sound the alarm before you’re monitored as a potential terrorist, please help. Go to http://www.f2a.org and click the first blinking alert to fight “hate crimes” and click the link to http://www.NoPoliticalProfiling.com to help us place a newspaper ad and sign the petition to fight the new definition of “terrorist,” she said.

“DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has labeled law-abiding citizens as ‘right-wing extremists’ and potential ‘terrorists’ … and has instructed state and local law enforcement to monitor, investigate and ‘report information concerning suspicious or criminal activity to DHS and the FBI,'” she wrote.

Under the DHS plan, she said, among those who would be listed as terrorists would be:

1. George Washington (military veteran and gun owner)
2. Mother Teresa (pro-life)
3. Ronald Reagan (pro-life and staunch advocate for less government), and
4. The pope (supports life and traditional marriage)

18
Apr
09

Justice Dept. Says NSA Overstepped: Sen. Feinstein Wants Probe

dontreadonme
A key U.S. spy agency overstepped legal limits in intercepting private e-mail messages and phone calls, Justice Department officials said Thursday, as a top lawmaker called for a probe.

The National Security Agency (NSA), an important intelligence-gathering arm of America’s vast espionage network, undertook the eavesdropping of US citizens’ electronic communications in a bid to thwart global terrorism.

But the agency exceeded the authority Congress has laid out, U.S. officials said, adding the problems, which have since been corrected, were detected during “routine oversight” of the domestic eavesdropping program.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the allegations are serious and warrant congressional investigation.

“These are serious allegations and we will make sure we get the facts,” the Democratic lawmaker said, vowing to convene hearings soon.

Federal justice authorities said the problem has been rectified.

“The Department of Justice . . . took comprehensive steps to correct the situation and bring the program into compliance,” said a statement from the Justice Department

The eavesdropping program was suspended until the fixes were in place.

“The Justice Department takes its national security oversight responsibilities seriously, and works diligently to ensure that surveillance under established legal authorities complies with the nation’s laws, regulations and policies, including those designed to protect privacy interests and civil liberties,” the agency said.

In a separate statement, the NSA said Thursday: “Our intelligence operations, including programs for collection and analysis, are in strict accordance with U.S. laws and regulations” as well as provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which governs espionage activities.

Because of the classified nature of the NSA’s work, details about the precise nature of the violation were not provided.

News reports citing official sources said the NSA overreach had been inadvertent and stemmed from ambiguities in new legislation regulating the government’s wiretapping powers.

The controversy is only the latest of many involving the warrantless wiretap program.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, former President George W. Bush authorized the NSA to monitor international phone calls, e-mails and other electronic communications without court authorization when at least one party was suspected of supporting or engaging in terrorist activities.

The former U.S. administration had asserted that it had the power to authorize domestic eavesdropping without court oversight.

But revelations in 2005 about the agency’s domestic espionage efforts sparked an outcry from civil liberties groups, as well as from some U.S. lawmakers.

Congress approved legislation last year stating that the targets of the eavesdropping had to be “reasonably believed” to be outside the United States and stating that the NSA needed court approval to monitor the purely domestic communications of Americans who under suspicion.

But other violations have also come to light, the Times reported, including the agency’s efforts to wiretap a member of Congress without court approval, while on an overseas trip.

The civil liberties community called on Congress to clamp down on NSA activities.

“Congress was repeatedly warned that this type of abuse would be the obvious outcome of passing the FISA Amendments Act,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office.

“It’s time to … restore the checks and balances of our surveillance system. Warrantless surveillance has no place in an America we can be proud of.

“These revelations make it clear that Congress must now make a commitment to rein in government surveillance,” she said.




Add to Technorati Favorites
May 2024
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031